Bickham v. Lammico
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
MAX N. TOBIAS, JR., Judge.
Bln this medical malpractice action, the plaintiffs, Jerry and Ella Bickham, appeal from a motion for summary judgment granted in favor of the defendant, the Estate of John D. Jackson, M.D. (“Dr. Jackson”), wherein the court determined: (1) Dr. Jackson was a qualified healthcare provider under the Louisiana Medical Malpractice Act, La. R.S. 40:1299.41, et seq. (the “Act”), at the time of the alleged malpractice, and (2) Dr. Jackson was entitled to summary judgment by virtue of a settlement entered into by the Bickhams and a co-defendant, Delta Radiology, L.L.C.…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Royal Ins. v. Romain Motor Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Hutchinson v. KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS, NO. 5747Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
- Miller v. LammicoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
- Sewell v. Doctors Hosp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
- Harris v. SternbergLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Richard Dickson v. Dr. Isaac A. OduduLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2022