Legal Opinion

Soliz v. Ammerman

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1964No. 10028Published

1Opinion of the Court

16 Utah 2d 11 (1964)

395 P.2d 25

EDDIE SOLIZ AND VIDALE SOLIZ, BY EDDIE SOLIZ, HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM, PLAINTIFFS AND RESPONDENTS,

v.

EDWARD WILSON AMMERMAN, BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, LaVERNE BRUCE AMMERMAN, AND LaVERNE BRUCE AMMERMAN, DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS.

No. 10028.

Supreme Court of Utah.

September 1, 1964.

Hanson & Garrett, Salt Lake City, for appellants.

Kipp & Charlier, Salt Lake City, for respondents.

WADE, Justice.

The defendant, Edward Wilson Ammerman, a minor, by his guardian ad litem appeals from a judgment of a jury verdict for $15,000 general damages and $446.25 special damages claimed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Soliz v. AmmermanUtah Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API