Gordon D. Mertens, Sr., and Marcella Mertens v. Ralph Hummell, Individually and as Chief of Police of Barrington Hills
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Per curiam
The court, having read the briefs, addressed itself to the record, and heard oral arguments, finds no abuse of discretion and no violation of constitutional rights in the lower court’s order dismissing the appellants’ case under Rule 37(b) for noncompliance with pre-trial discovery orders. Similarly, we find no abuse of discretion in the lower court’s denial of leave to file a third amended complaint.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the district court’s memorandum opinion, that opinion is affirmed and adopted as the opinion of this court. Costs are awarded to the appellees.
AFFIRMED.
IN…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Klee v. Pittsburgh & West Virginia Railway Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
3Cited by19 opinions
- Ayatollah Syed M. J. Iqbal Jafree v. John R. Barber, Acting Special Agent, Federal Bureau of InvestigationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Heyl & Patterson International, Incorporated v. F. D. Rich Housing of the Virgin Islands, Incorporated and F. D. Rich Housing Corporation, F. D. Rich Housing of the Virgin Islands, Incorporated, as Assignee of F. D. Rich Housing of Puerto Rico, Incorporated v. Government of the Virgin IslandsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Heyl & Patterson International, Inc. v. F. D. Rich Housing of Virgin Islands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Conroy Datsun Ltd. v. Nissan Motor Corp. in U. S. A.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980
- Manuel v. International Harvester Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.