Legal Opinion · Dissent

People ex rel. Mooney v. Hutchinson

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1898Published

Original petition for mandamus.

1DissentJustice Wilkin

In the limited time at my disposal I can only state in a general way why I think the foregoing opinion and .conclusion unsound.

The proposition, “the provision authorizing the apportionment of the State into such Senatorial districts is section 6 of article 4,” is, in my opinion, a misconception, and forms the basis of the wrong conclusion reached. That section does not empower the General Assembly to make apportionment laws, nor does its language purport to do so. It only declares how the power already existing in the legislature shall be exercised. Nor can I see how the fact that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Board of TrusteesIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  2. People ex rel. Woodyatt v. ThompsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  3. People ex rel. Burgess v. WilsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1854

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API