Legal Opinion

Minnis v. Abrams

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1900PublishedCited by 12 opinions

FROM HAMILTON. Appeal from Chancery Court of Hamilton County. T. M. McConnell, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlister, J.

This bill was filed to collect balance due on a promissory note and to enforce vendor’s lien for same on tract of land in Hamilton County.

The principal controversy in the case was wheth*663■er the note was barred by the statute of limitations. The note was for $400. It was dated in 1886, and the bill was not filed until 1898. Complainant relied on a new promise made by a letter 'written to complainant by the maker of the note, in which he assured him the statute of limitations should never run against the debt and lien. The maker of the note died, and this bill was filed ■against his widow,…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dillon v. GraySupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  2. Leffek v. LuedemanMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Fitch v. MartinNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Christofiel v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1956
  5. Klein v. YorkTennessee Supreme Court · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API