Legal Opinion

Sardinia v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 31, 1964No. 63-754PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a denial of an application for relief pursuant to the provisions of Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1 F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix. We affirm.

It appears, from the transcript of the trial proceedings, that the appellant had counsel at the time of the trials which resulted in the convictions involved here. Therefore, having had counsel at the time of his trials [even though he may have plead guilty] there is no merit to his contention that he was denied due process because counsel could have made appropriate motions to have the pleas of guilty set aside. See: § 909.13, Fla.Stat.,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jackman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sardinia v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1964
  2. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  3. Swarthout v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  4. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  5. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API