Legal Opinion

Reinhart v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided October 24, 1925No. A-5110PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.

From a conviction in the county court of Oklahoma county upon a charge of having possession of intoxicating liquor with intent to sell, the plaintiffs in error, hereinafter called defendants, have appealed.

Two assignments of error are argued: First, that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict; second, error of the court in admitting evidence obtained by an illegal search. Upon the first assignment we do not deem it necessary to review the evidence. An examination of the record discloses sufficient evidence from which the jury might reasonably and logically find the defendants…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Terry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Whitford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Cook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Boswell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. Gardner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API