Legal Opinion

Mayer v. Mayer

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 17, 1943No. Gen. No. 42,221PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kiley

This is a divorce action by a husband with a counterclaim for separate maintenance. The trial court found that the parties had been reconciled since the filing of the suits, and of its own motion dismissed the wife’s cross-complaint, and on the husband’s motion dismissed the complaint. The appeal is prosecuted on behalf of the wife. Her counsel made a motion to vacate the decree and incorporated in the motion by reference a verified petition of defendant, in which she admitted resumption of marital relations since the suits were filed. The petition claimed that the complaint should not have…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. StegerIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. McCulloch v. MurphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Newman v. NewmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Klemme v. KlemmeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1890
  5. Druce v. DruceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Richheimer v. RichheimerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  2. Hefner v. HefnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API