Kutzler v. AMF Harley-Davidson
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell
Plaintiff, James Kutzler, appeals from the dismissal of his first amended complaint pursuant to the section 2 — 615 motion (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 110, par. 2 — 615) filed by defendant, AMF Harley-Davidson, a motorcycle manufacturer. Plaintiff sought damages for injuries sustained when an automobile sideswiped him while he was riding his motorcycle. Count I of plaintiffs complaint alleged that the motorcycle was unreasonably dangerous because: (1) it had not been designed, manufactured, assembled, sold or distributed with “crash bars, leg protection structures or other devices which would…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hunt v. BlasiusIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
- Buehler v. WhalenIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
- Camacho v. Honda Motor Co., Ltd.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Miller v. DvornikAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Fuller v. Fend-All Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Leroy Faucett v. Ingersoll-Rand Mining & MacHinery Company, a Division of Ingersoll-Rand CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Carrizales v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- Wortel v. Somerset Industries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002
- McWilliams v. Yamaha Motor Corp. USADistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
- French v. Barber-Greene Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.