Walsh v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REGINALD W. GIBSON, Judge:
This is a pro se tax refund suit pursuant to which jurisdiction in this court is premised on the Tucker Act, Section 1491, Title 28 United States Code.
Defendant has moved to dismiss subject complaint on two grounds — (i) this court lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter in that plaintiff failed to file a claim for refund, and (ii) the complaint fails to set forth a claim upon which relief can be granted.
This court agrees with the defendant with respect to its initial position, does not reach defendant’s second position, and therefore dismisses the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Felt & Tarrant Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Disabled American Veterans v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
- Hampton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fiebelkorn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Williams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
- Fourstar v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Crane v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Fiebelkorn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.