Legal Opinion

Hilfiker v. Adams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 5, 1939Published

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: A car owned and operated by plaintiff Hilfiker and one owned and operated by the defendant collided at a road intersection. The defendant had the statutory right of way (Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 82, subd. 4.) Of course, such right of way is not absolute. (Shuman v. Hall, 246 N. Y. 51; Plants v. Greiner, 232 App. Div. 73.) However, plaintiff’s own recital of the way in which the accident occurred plainly shows that he does not bring himself within the doctrine laid down in the cited cases, and a nonsuit was properly granted on the ground that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shuman v. HallNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Plantz v. GreinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API