Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Taylor Tobacco Enterprises, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 6, 1979No. 7813SC691PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Respondents first contend that the trial court erred in denying its motion to dismiss and motion for judgment on the pleadings because “the Administrative Inspection Warrant is unconstitutional on its face.”

Art. I, § 20 of the North Carolina Constitution is as follows:

General warrants, whereby an officer or other person may be commanded to search suspected places without evidence of the act committed, or to seize any person or persons not named, whose offense is not particularly described and supported by evidence, are dangerous to liberty and shall not be granted.

Respondent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. State Ex Rel. Accident Prevention Division v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  5. State v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gooden v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  2. In re Inspection of Galvan Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API