Legal Opinion

Boland v. Bellis

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 31, 1960No. 5-2227PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. Seaborn Holt, Associate Justice.

Appellant, S. O. Boland, brought this suit to cancel an alleged forged mineral deed. Appellees, J. H. Bellis and Heirs of J. H. Bellis, L. H. Owens, Heirs of L. H. Owens, W. E. Witt and Unknown Heirs of W. E. Witt, answered with a denial that the deed was forged. Prom a decree denying appellant the relief prayed is this appeal.

The record reflects that on March 1, 1929, E. A. Woods and wife [the record title owners of a tract of land containing 102 acres] purportedly conveyed a one-half undivided interest in and to the minerals under this land to J. H.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Werbe v. HoltSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  2. Weaver v. WeaverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Oller v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  2. Mack v. ColeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API