Legal Opinion

Baxter v. Baxter

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 20, 1996No. 96-1904PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Judge.

The record in this case is almost lacking but both sides ignore the fact of the inadequate record and cite facts as though there were some record support for the cite. There is, however, sufficient record on one critical point: appellant’s attorney made no effort to give notice to his client of the hearing on his Motion to Withdraw. Even so, the trial court permitted him to withdraw from the ease. This violated the provisions of Rule 2.060(i), Fla. R. of Jud. Adm:

An attorney shall not be permitted to withdraw from an action unless the withdrawal is approved by the court. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Abrams v. PaulDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. Seinsheimer Companies v. Cobia Pt. Condo. AssociationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. ITT/Palm Coast Utilities v. DouglasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. Saenz v. PenaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  3. METROPOLITAN MORTGAGE COMPANY OF MIAMI, etc. v. IVOR H. ROSE, etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API