Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human Resources

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 29, 2001No. 99-1848Published

1Concurrence

Justice Scalia, with whom Justice Thomas joins,

concurring.

I join the opinion of the Court in its entirety, and write to respond at greater length to the contentions of the dissent.

I

“Prevailing party” is not some newfangled legal term invented for use in late-20th-eentury fee-shifting statutes. *611“[B]y the long established practice and universally recognized rule of the common law, in actions at law, the prevailing party is entitled to recover a judgment for costs . . . .” Mansfield, C. & L. M. R. Co. v. Swan, 111 U.S. 379, 387 (1884).

“Costs have usually been allowed to the prevailing party, as…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API