Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human Resources
Supreme Court of the United States
1Concurrence
Justice Scalia, with whom Justice Thomas joins,
concurring.
I join the opinion of the Court in its entirety, and write to respond at greater length to the contentions of the dissent.
I
“Prevailing party” is not some newfangled legal term invented for use in late-20th-eentury fee-shifting statutes. *611“[B]y the long established practice and universally recognized rule of the common law, in actions at law, the prevailing party is entitled to recover a judgment for costs . . . .” Mansfield, C. & L. M. R. Co. v. Swan, 111 U.S. 379, 387 (1884).
“Costs have usually been allowed to the prevailing party, as…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.