Legal Opinion
Hayman v. ALL AMERICAN LIFE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Decided February 12, 1975No. Civ. 645-71PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
PESQUERA, District Judge.
Defendant, All American Life and Casualty Company, has moved for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure alleging in substance that there is no genuine issue as to the fact that James E. Hayman omitted to state and concealed from defendant insurer in his application for the life insurance object of this action, certain material facts which, had they been known to defendant, it would not have issued the policy. Defendant’s motion is supported by several pieces of documentary evidence which will be identified during the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- MFA Mutual Insurance Company v. LusbyDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1969
- Lucille Coleman v. Aetna Life Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
- San Francisco Lathing Co. v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- New York Life Ins. v. SimonsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1932
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Leonard C. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ocaso, S.A. Compañia De Seguros Y Reaseguros v. Puerto Rico Maritime Shipping AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1996