Legal Opinion

Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Harrell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 2, 1923No. 6574PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Findings of Fact.

JENKINS, J.

Appellees shipped three cars ■ of sheep from Denver, Colo., to Santa Anna, Tex. vThey were reshipped, under a new contract, at Amarillo, Tex., to the same destination. Appellees alleged that some of the sheep were killed, some were lost, and the remaindef were damaged by negligence of appellants. The ease was submitted upon special issues as follows:

“Question No. 1: Were any of the sheep in question injured, by the negligence of the defendant, his servants, agents, or employés in the manner alleged in plaintiff’s petition; answering ‘yes’ or ‘no’? Answer: Yes. ’
“Que…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dallas Consolidated Electric Street Railway Co. v. McAllisterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  2. Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co. v. BlackstoneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Young v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
  2. Sweetwater Progressive Mut. Life & Accident Ass'n v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. London & Lancashire Ins. Co. v. HigginsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. State Mortgage Corp. v. GroosCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Chenango Textile Corp. v. WillockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API