People v. Masters
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
WHITE, P. J., Concurring and Dissenting.
I think that the result the court’s opinion publishes today is tenable; certainly the consequences of appellant’s violence warrants the law’s maximum punishment. However, the court’s ratiocination is untenable, I think, in light of the record under review revealing the superior court’s silence as to a matter on which its *1131jurisdiction may be said to precariously hinge. “ ‘A court may have jurisdiction of the cause of action and of the parties, but it may lack the authority or power to act in the case except in a particular way. Under such circumstances,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- People v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. DeVaughnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.