Legal Opinion

Britt v. State

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1923No. Criminal No. 580PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant was convicted of selling intoxicating liquors to one John Bart, at Wickenburg, Maricopa county. He was sentenced to serve six months in the county jail and to pay a fine of $150. He appeals, assigning several errors, some of which we think are meritorious. We notice only those that we consider well taken.

The defendant is a barber, and at the time of the alleged sale (March 22, 1923) had a barber-shop at Wickenburg. The only eye-witness to testify to the alleged sale was Edward Devanney, a deputy sheriff and constable of Wickenburg’ precinct. Devanney employed John Bart, who was a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. NicelySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  2. Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Commonwealth v. BubnisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  4. Holder v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
  5. Commonwealth v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1936
  2. State v. SingletonArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Burgunder v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1940
  4. State v. MooreArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  5. State of Arizona v. GuerreroArizona Supreme Court · 1942

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API