Legal Opinion

Price v. Mut. L. Ins. Co. of Baltimore

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 20, 1933No. Appeal 269PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

The plaintiff took out a policy of insurance in the defendant company on the life of her nine year old daughter, Buth. It was, in form, what is commonly called an industrial policy. The premium was payable weekly. No written application for insurance was attached to the policy, which contained, inter alia, the following conditions, subject to which it was issued:

“Second. This policy is void until the same is actually delivered to the insured in person while in sound health ...... Fifth. Agents (which term includes superintendents and assistant superintendents) are not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Youngblood v. Prud. Ins. Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Peters v. Colonial Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Matovich v. Mut. B.H. A. Assn.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Matovich v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. OrdonoffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Stein v. New York Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API