Legal Opinion

Goodale v. Hathaway

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1934PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This is a personal injury action arising

out of an automobile collision. In view of the errors assigned, no statement of facts is necessary. There was no motion for nonsuit or directed verdict. Hence this court is not concerned with the evidence relative to' the' issue of negligence. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $2,500, the defendant appeals.

Error is predicated on the denial of motion for mistrial because of the alleged misconduct of counsel in bringing to the attention of the jury the matter of insurance. Harry Cambridge, an automobile mechanic, was called as a witness…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. West v. JaloffOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Coblentz v. JaloffOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Wells v. MorrisonOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Fletcher v. SaundersOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Webb v. Hoover-Guernsey Dairy Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. BettsOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Cameron v. GoreeOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Burghardt v. OlsonOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Curtin v. BenjaminMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  5. McVay v. ByarsOregon Supreme Court · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API