Legal Opinion

State v. Ellis

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 26, 1937No. 31,009Published

1Opinion of the Court

Holt, Justice.

Defendant, convicted of a violation of 2 Mason Minn. St. 1927, § 10128, appeals from the order denying a new trial and from the judgment. Two main grounds are urged for a reversal: (a) The verdict is contrary to the evidence and the law; and (b) the court erred in certain specified instructions.

That part of § 10128 which defendant was charged with transgressing reads: “Every person who shall take a female under the age of eighteen years, for the purpose of prostitution or sexual intercourse, * * * shall be guilty of abduction and punished,” etc. The indictment as amended charged…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. The People v. . PlathNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Hermann v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  3. State v. MarshSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. People v. RagoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  5. State v. LauzerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API