Legal Opinion

In re Kaltenbach

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 5, 1992No. 92-5688PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. Petitioner is allowed until October 26, 1992, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.

Justice Blackmun and Justice Stevens would deny the petition for writ of habeas corpus.

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. Purvis Ray Cartwright and Purvis Jerome PatrickCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. Bill WilderCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  4. Glaziers & Glassworkers Union Local 252 Annuity Fund v. Newbridge Securities, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Pension Plan of Public Service Co. v. KPMG Peat MarwickDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API