Legal Opinion

101 Studio, Inc. v. Bardal

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 11, 1974No. 73 Civ. 3606PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

OWEN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, 101 Studios Inc., a commercial photographic studio, and its sole stockholder and president, Anthony Ruta, seek a preliminary injunction pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P., Rule 65 enjoining the defendants, various officials of the City of New York, from enforcing the licensing provisions of Article I of Title B, Chapter 32 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York1 with respect to their place of business, on the ground that said licensing regulations are unconstitutionally vague on their face in violation of the First and Fourteenth…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Zwickler v. KootaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Merco Properties, Inc. v. GuggenheimerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API