Zirker v. Hughes
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Merced County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Hayne, C.
Application for writ of mandate against the auditor of Merced County to compel him to draw a warrant upon the treasurer in favor of petitioner for $640.77. The petitioner was the holder by assignment of a claim against the county for $952.77. This claim was presented by him to the board of supervisors for allowance, and was allowed by them for the amount which petitioner claims here, viz., $640.77, and no more. The petitioner then sued the county in the justice’s court for $299.99 (said amount being a part of his said claim), and recovered judgment for that sum and costs, which…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Mattson v. City of Costa MesaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- City of Los Angeles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Cooley v. County of CalaverasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Lehmann v. SchmidtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Bowman v. Ogden CityUtah Supreme Court · 1908
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.