Legal Opinion

Hines v. Dozer

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 22, 1961No. 61-520PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant, Edward G. Hines, was allowed to intervene as a defendant in an action brought by Dale E. Cunningham, an incumbent city commissioner of the City of Opa Locka, Florida. The complaint brought by Cunningham sought to enjoin a recall election, and named as defendant Hester Dozer, as city clerk. Two additional commissioners, Frank J. Wead *549and Wilbur R. Dale were allowed to intervene as plaintiffs. Thus the parties stood in the lower court as follows : Commissioners Cunningham, Wead and Dale as plaintiffs and the city clerk joined by Hines as defendants.

The commissioners in their…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Joyner v. ShumanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  2. Dulaney v. City of Miami BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1957
  3. Curtis Pools, Inc. v. FultonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gordon v. LeathermanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  2. Tolar v. JohnsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  3. Piver v. StallmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  4. Taines v. GalvinSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  5. Gordon v. LeathermanDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API