State v. Wolfe
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, P.J.
¶ 1. Paul L. Wolfe appeals from an order of the trial court arguing that a sentencing judgment wrongly applied sentence credit to a stayed consecutive sentence rather than the sentence for which he was incarcerated. The basic question before us is whether a court, in a multiple count conviction where one sentence is imposed and another stayed, must apply sentence credit to the conviction of the first imposed sentence. We hold that it must under the rule of State v. Boettcher, 144 Wis. 2d 86, 100, 423 N.W.2d 533 (1988), and State v. Rohl, 160 Wis. 2d 325, 330, 466 N.W.2d 208 (Ct. App. 1991).
¶…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. BoettcherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. RohlCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
- Wilson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Struzik v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. EilolaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. MiddletonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. Andrew M. ObriechtWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2010
- State v. TrepanierCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.