Legal Opinion · Dissent
Holcomb v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided April 2, 1951No. 4647Published
1DissentRobinson, J.
In my opinion a reversible error was committed when the trial court permitted the State to introduce evidence calculated to impeach the defendant, when such evidence is not admissible in accordance with § 28-707, Ark. Stats., which is as follows:
“Impeachment of witness of opposite party. — A witness may be impeached by the party against whom he is produced, by contradictory evidence by showing that he has made statements different from his present testimony, or by evidence that his general reputation for truth or morality render him unworthy of belief, but not by evidence of particular…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hollingsworth v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1890
- Smith v. ToddSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
- Vance v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1902
- State Medical Board v. RodgersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
- Owen v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.