Legal Opinion

Newman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 11, 1930No. 128PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.

The petitioner-earnestly contends that he did not receive stock which had a “fair market value” for the reason that he eould not sell such stock to any one in 1920 without violating his contract with King and Wood. There is a heavy burden on the taxpayer “of proving that the Commissioner’s action was plainly arbitrary.” Lucas v. Kansas City Structural Steel Co. (April 14, 1930) 281 U. S. 264, 50 S. Ct. 263, 266, 74 L. Ed. 848. See, also, Lucas v. American Code Co., 280 U. S. 445, 50 S. Ct. 202, 74 L. Ed. 538, and Williamsport Wire Rope Co. v. United States, 277 U. S.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lucas v. American Code Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Lucas v. Kansas City Structural Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Williamsport Wire Rope Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Helvering v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
  2. Loose v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  3. Heiner v. GwinnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
  4. Helvering v. Kendrick Coal & Dock Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  5. Trinity Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API