Arnold v. Weil
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Habeas Corpus.
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, District Judge.
This is a habeas corpus proceeding similar to that of Pereles v. Weil (decided herewith) 157 Fed. 419. The indictment covers 108 pages of typewriting, and contains 4 counts. It is of an entirely different character from that in the Pereles Case. The first count charges a willful and corrupt conspiracy to make false, fictitious, feigned, illegal, forged, and fraudulent entries and filings, to induce, persuade, and hire other persons to make like entries; to make false, fictitious, feigned, forged and fraudulent papers, statements, and affidavits; and to make false…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Hyde v. ShineSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- United States v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Dealy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- In Re PalliserSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hyde v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1910
- United States v. EcclesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1910
- United States v. WellsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912