Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Weil

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided November 15, 1907PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Habeas Corpus.

1Opinion of the Court

SANBORN, District Judge.

This is a habeas corpus proceeding similar to that of Pereles v. Weil (decided herewith) 157 Fed. 419. The indictment covers 108 pages of typewriting, and contains 4 counts. It is of an entirely different character from that in the Pereles Case. The first count charges a willful and corrupt conspiracy to make false, fictitious, feigned, illegal, forged, and fraudulent entries and filings, to induce, persuade, and hire other persons to make like entries; to make false, fictitious, feigned, forged and fraudulent papers, statements, and affidavits; and to make false…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Hyde v. ShineSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. United States v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Dealy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. In Re PalliserSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hyde v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. United States v. EcclesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1910
  3. United States v. WellsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API