Legal Opinion

Skolnick v. Max Connor, LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 3, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The record establishes that dismissal of the third-party complaint under CPLR 1010 was a provident exercise of the court’s discretion. Defendants third-party plaintiffs delayed in bringing the third-party action until almost a year after the main action for personal injuries was commenced and months after the filing of the note of issue, despite being aware of a potential contractual indemnification claim against third-party defendant (see Grant v Wainer, 179 AD2d 364, 365 [1992]). The record supports the court’s finding that the defendants “knowingly and deliberately delayed the commencement…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Grant v. WainerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Gomez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Range v. Trustees of Columbia Univ. in the City of N.Y.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  2. Morales v. 88th Ave. Owner, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025
  3. Soto v. CBS Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API