Highland v. Davis

I respectfully dissent from point 2 of the syllabus for reasons stated in my dissent to the former decision. Since this opinion has reopened the Sabotka incident; I repeat, for convenience, my former observations thereon.

“John Sabotka was the field agent of Finance Corporation. Cecil Highland testified, without contradiction, that in February or March of 1934, Sabotka, after obtaining information of the condition of the Highland estate and of the value of the collateral on the note in question, ‘assured’ the witness ‘that he would not embarrass the Highland estate, that all they (Finance…