Legal Opinion

James v. Hoagland

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 17, 1973No. 55286PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

UHLENHOPP, Justice.

In this appeal we must decide a question of abatement for payment of federal and state estate taxes and costs of administration.

Comprehension of testatrix’ intent requires that most of her will be set out:

ITEM I. I first direct the payment of my just debts and expenses of my last illness and burial.

ITEM II. I direct the payment of the following enumerated specific bequests:

A. My home residence located in Ruthven, Iowa, shall go to and be the *579property of whichever son of mine desires to use the said property as his permanent home and residence. I make this provision, knowing…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McCulloch's Estate v. ConradSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
  2. In Re Estate of HartmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  3. Leighton v. LeightonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  4. Wells v. MennSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
  5. In Re the Estate of MiguetSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Estate of HoaglandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API