James v. Hoagland
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
UHLENHOPP, Justice.
In this appeal we must decide a question of abatement for payment of federal and state estate taxes and costs of administration.
Comprehension of testatrix’ intent requires that most of her will be set out:
ITEM I. I first direct the payment of my just debts and expenses of my last illness and burial.
ITEM II. I direct the payment of the following enumerated specific bequests:
A. My home residence located in Ruthven, Iowa, shall go to and be the *579property of whichever son of mine desires to use the said property as his permanent home and residence. I make this provision, knowing…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McCulloch's Estate v. ConradSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
- In Re Estate of HartmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
- Leighton v. LeightonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
- Wells v. MennSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
- In Re the Estate of MiguetSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Estate of HoaglandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973