Legal Opinion

Babich v. River Oaks Toyota

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 8, 2007No. 1-05-3728PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE NEVILLE

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff, Matthew Babich, filed a two-count complaint (a products liability count and a negligent spoliation count) against the defendants, Flair Design, Ltd. (Flair Design), and River Oaks Toyota (Toyota). After Babich settled with Flair Design, Toyota filed a motion for summary judgment and requested that the court enter a judgment for it and against Babich. The trial court granted the motion after finding that the limitations period for the products liability action had expired. In this appeal, we are presented with the following…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ward v. K Mart Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Leonardi v. Loyola University of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Home Insurance v. Cincinnati InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Boyd v. Travelers InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Kazubowski v. KazubowskiIllinois Supreme Court · 1970

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re Marriage of PavlovichAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
  2. Kern v. Arlington Ridge Pathology, S.C.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  3. Horne v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
  4. Horne v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
  5. Kern v. Arlington Ridge Pathology, S.C.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API