Legal Opinion

Buttrick v. Arthur Lessard & Sons, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 30, 1969No. 5813Published

1Opinion of the Court

110 N.H. 36 (1969)

CLIFTON R. BUTTRICK

v.

ARTHUR LESSARD & SONS, INC.

No. 5813.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire.

December 30, 1969.

Upton, Sanders & Upton and Ernest T. Smith, III (Mr. Smith orally), for the plaintiff.

Hall, Zellers, Morse & Gallagher (Mr. Mayland H. Morse, Jr. orally), for the defendant.

GRIFFITH, J.

This case presents the question of whether a person sustaining personal injuries and property damage because of a defect in an automobile sold him by the defendant can recover without proof that the defendant was negligent.

Plaintiff was nonsuited at the conclusion of his opening statement…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  3. Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Santor v. a & M KARAGHEUSIAN, INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API