Legal Opinion

Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. Stewart

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1884No. 10,724PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Erom the Superior Court of Marion County.

1Opinion of the Court

Black, C.

The appellant’s complaint against the appellees was held bad on demurrer, for want of sufficient facts.

The complaint showed, in substance, that, in 1875, one .John E. Haynes, being the owner of certain real estate in Indianapolis, executed to the appellant a mortgage thereon, to secure the payment of a note for the sum of $2,000, payable in five years, and coupon notes for semi-annual instalments of interest on said sum, said notes being made by said Haynes to the appellant, and said mortgage being duly recorded in the month in which it was executed; that in 1876 and 1877, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Crosier v. AcerNew York Court of Chancery · 1838

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ex parte Walter Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  2. Wheeler v. HawkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Ritchie v. CarterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1901
  4. Ambs v. TowleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Keehn v. McGillicuddyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API