In re the Claim of Lester
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtReynolds, J.
Appeal by the claimant from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualifying claimant from benefits because he lost employment through his misconduct (Labor Law, § 593, subd. 3). The determination of the board that claimant lost his employment through misconduct is factual and thus must be upheld if supported by substantial evidence (e.g., Matter of Rivera [Catherwood], 28 A D 2d 1036). The issue of credibility is also clearly within the exclusive province of the board (e.g., Matter of Soman [Glenshaw Glass], 28 A D 2d 219). Here there is present no more than conflicting…
2Cited by36 opinions
- Peak v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Moore v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- In re the Claim of McGlynnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- In re the Claim of LevickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Moore v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.