Legal Opinion

Harsh v. Hanauer

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 15, 1854PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Randolph Owcuit Court. Before Hon. B. H. Neely, Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice WateiNS

The appellant, on the 29th of January, 1852, instituted his action of debt against the appellees, upon a promissory note, alleged to have been executed by the firm of M. Hanuer &Sons, composed of M. Ilanuer and the appellees, on the 21st of Octo. ber, 1841, payable five and a half years after date ; to which the defendant, Daniel, pleaded nil debet, payment, tie statute of limitation of five years, and the statute of three years; and the defendant, Louis, pleaded nil debet, and also a plea under oath denying the execution of the note. The Court below overruled a demurrer to the plea of three…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Puckett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1902
  2. Purcell Mill & Elevator Co. v. KirklandCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API