McDonnell v. Sanford Airport Authority
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ON APPELLANTS’ MOTION FOR REHEARING AND/OR REHEARING EN BANC
BERGER, J.
We decline the invitation by Appellants’ counsel to reconsider the merits of our decision in this case. We write only to address counsel’s abuse of the rehearing process and to comment on the propriety of filing a motion for rehearing when the court issues a per curiam affirmance without opinion.
The purpose of a motion for rehearing is to direct the court to points of law or fact that, in the opinion of the movant, the court overlooked or misapprehended in its opinion. See Rule 9.330(a), Fla. R. App. P. It is not a vehicle…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Jaytex Realty Co. v. GreenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
- 5-H CORP. v. PadovanoSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
- Amador v. WalkerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Ayala v. GonzalezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Elliott v. ElliottDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jedak Corp. v. Seabreeze Office Assoc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- BRENT BLAKE v. AMERICAN SALES AND MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION LLC D/B/A EULEN AMERICADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021
- Joshua S. Winegar v. Gabrielle D. WinegarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026