Legal Opinion
Campbell Sixty-Six Express, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided August 3, 1979No. 78-1060PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion PER CURIAM.
2Per curiam
This is an appeal from an ICC order issuing an unrestricted certificate of public convenience and necessity (pursuant to section 207(a) of the ICC Act, 49 U.S.C. § 307(a)) to Deaton, Inc., a “motor common carrier.” Petitioners are competing common carriers. They allege that the ICC’s failure to restrict Deaton’s certificate to prohibit “tacking”1 will allow Deaton to compete with and injure petitioners. We agree with petitioners’ argument that the ICC did not adequately explain the reasons for its decision. Accordingly, the case is remanded to the ICC.
I. FACTS
Petitioners’…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Humboldt Express, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Robert L. Curtis and Southern Forwarding Co., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Ace Motor Freight, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Freeport Transport, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Chem-Haulers, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
4Cited by1 opinion
- Cadc 79-14 Campbell Sixty-Six Express, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979