Legal Opinion · Dissent

Detroit Wabeek Bank & Trust Co. v. City of Adrian

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1957No. Docket 65, Calendar 46,855Published

1DissentDethmers, C. J.

{dissenting). I do not concur in affirmance. The cases are myriad which hold that the duty of the court in interpreting or construing a will is to ascertain, from all its parts, the true intent of the testator and, where lawful, to give it effect. They run from Jameson’s Appeal, 1 Mich 99, to In re Lawton Estate, 347 Mich 143. As said in In re Scheyer’s Estate, 336 Mich 645, 648, 649 (38 ALR2d 835):

“ ‘The primary rule of construction is to ascertain the true intention of the testator. That intention must be ascertained from a consideration of all the provisions of the will itself and in the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Holmes v. WalterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Johnson v. SkinnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Sears v. ChildsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  4. In Re Scheyer's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Manning v. ManningMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API