Detroit Wabeek Bank & Trust Co. v. City of Adrian
Michigan Supreme Court
1DissentDethmers, C. J.
{dissenting). I do not concur in affirmance. The cases are myriad which hold that the duty of the court in interpreting or construing a will is to ascertain, from all its parts, the true intent of the testator and, where lawful, to give it effect. They run from Jameson’s Appeal, 1 Mich 99, to In re Lawton Estate, 347 Mich 143. As said in In re Scheyer’s Estate, 336 Mich 645, 648, 649 (38 ALR2d 835):
“ ‘The primary rule of construction is to ascertain the true intention of the testator. That intention must be ascertained from a consideration of all the provisions of the will itself and in the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Holmes v. WalterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Johnson v. SkinnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Sears v. ChildsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- In Re Scheyer's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
- Manning v. ManningMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.