In the Interest of S.A.A.

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice MURPHY.

This appeal is from a divorce decree. In three points of error, appellant Sergio Be-navides Adame contends the trial court abused its discretion by ordering the marriage dissolved on the unpled ground of mutual adultery and by allocating the entire marital tax debt to Adame. For reasons that follow, we sustain Adame’s first point of error and reform the judgment to delete the finding of mutual adultery. Otherwise, we affirm the trial court’s judgment as modified.

background

In her original petition for divorce from Adame, appellee Ruth Mata claimed the parties…