Stone v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RILEY, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Defendant-Appellant Jarrod M. Stone (Stone) appeals the adverse judgment on his motion to suppress evidence.
We affirm.
ISSUES
Stone presents the following issues for review:
1. Whether the court erred in denying defendant's motion to suppress evidence when the evidence was seized as a result of a patdown search in which the defendant was requested to remove his shoes.
2. Whether the finding of the court was sustained by sufficient evidence.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On June 22, 1995, Officer Chester Gooch (Officer Gooch) was patrolling on 33rd Street and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Commonwealth v. BorgesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Harless v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Drake v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- People v. SorensonIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
- Wright v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- State v. WaldrupSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
- Stalling v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- State v. ValleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.