Legal Opinion
Baxter v. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 30, 1993No. Civ. 5:91-480 (JAC)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PENDING MOTIONS
JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Chief Judge:
Pending before the court are plaintiffs motion for summary judgment (filed May 8, 1992), plaintiffs motion to dismiss the third party complaint (filed May 11, 1992), defendant’s motion for summary judgment (filed June 15, 1992), defendant’s motion for certification (filed June 15, 1992), and defendant’s motion to transfer the case (filed Feb. 19, 1993).
Background
This case arises out of personal injuries that Andrew T. Baxter sustained when a small caliber, single action revolver accidentally discharged. Defendant/third party plaintiff…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wells v. Simonds Abrasive Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- O'Connor v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Mark Wayne v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- prod.liab.rep.(cch)p. 13,739 William L. Baxter, Ppa Andrew T. Baxter, Third-Party-Defendant v. Sturm, Ruger & Co. Inc., Third-Party-PlaintiffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Won Joo Hyun v. South Kent SchoolDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1996