Monroe v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-216C (Filed: May 31, 2019) ALONZA MONROE, ) Claim for refund of garnishment of Army ) retirement pay; applicability of the Plaintiff, ) Uniformed Service Former Spouses’ ) Protection Act;
10 U.S.C. § 1408
v. ) ) UNITED STATES, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) Alonza Monroe, pro se, Elgin, Oklahoma. Borislav Kushnir, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for defendant. With him on the brief were Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division, and Robert E. Kirschman,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.