Legal Opinion

Fresno v. Royal Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Puerto Rico

Decided April 29, 1932No. 5296Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wole

The plaintiff after a fire and alleged loss attached the interest of G-arcia Bros, in the proceeds of an insurance policy. The Boyal Insurance Co., Ltd., against whom the attachment ran, refused to pay, and this suit is the consequence. The defense of the insurance company was that the fire was not casual; denied that García Bros, after the fire delivered *415to the insurance company all. the documents required by the policy; alleged that Garcia Bros, pnt in a claim of total destruction of $14,592.04 against the defendant and another ■company -when in point of fact on the day of' the fire said…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Northern Assur. Co. v. Del MoralCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API