Legal Opinion

Bragg v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 21, 1938No. 4 Div. 20PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

The reversal of the judgment of conviction by the Court of Appeals is rested upon the refusal of charge 6, requested by defendant, and reproduced in the opinion of that court.

That the concluding clause as to the burden of proof resting upon the State, under the stated circumstances, to show defendant was not free from fault, stated a correct principle, is of course well understood, and not here controverted. Bluitt v. State, 161 Ala. 14, 49 So. 854; Richardson v. State, 191 Ala. 21, 68 So. 57.

But in consideration of refused charges, to save error, the rule of strict…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ex Parte StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  2. O'Rear v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  3. Bluitt v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  4. Cain v. SkillinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  5. Jebeles-Colias Conf. Co. v. BoozeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Griffin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Morris v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. FoxAlabama Court of Appeals · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API