Legal Opinion

Sabol v. Parrish Realty of Zebulon, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 19, 1985No. 859SC107PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Parrish Realty argues that the court erred in denying its motions for a directed verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict on the issue of its negligence because plaintiffs failed to prove that Parrish Realty or any of its agents committed the acts which were the proximate cause of plaintiffs’ damages. In ruling on a defendant’s motions for a directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict, the court must take the evidence in favor of the plaintiff as true, resolve any conflicts in the evidence in the plaintiffs favor and give the plaintiff the benefit of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hairston v. Alexander Tank & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Summey v. CauthenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Northern National Life Insurance v. Lacy J. Miller MacHine Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Greene v. NicholsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. Kekelis v. Whitin MacHine WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Springs v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  2. Farrelly v. Hamilton SquareCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  3. Edmondson v. MacClesfield LP Gas Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  4. Montgomery v. N.C. Department of CorrectionNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2007
  5. Sabol v. Parrish Realty of Zebulon, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API