Jindal v. Jindal

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Rosalyn Richter, J.), entered December 28, 2007, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the durational residency requirement of Domestic Relations Law § 230 has not been satisfied and on the ground of forum non conveniens, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The durational residency requirement set forth in Domestic Relations Law § 230 (5) is satisfied by evidence that for two years prior to commencement of the action, plaintiff, although spending a portion of…