State v. Boozer
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
McAULIFFE, Judge.
The issue before us is whether a defendant once placed in jeopardy on a charge of committing a fourth degree sexual offense may be subjected to a second prosecution for attempted fourth degree sexual offense when both charges arose out of the same criminal episode but the State alleged separate acts by the defendant in each charging document. We hold that the second prosecution is permitted under the facts of this case.
Hampton Boozer was initially charged in the District Court of Maryland. The statement of charges alleged that the defendant “[d]id engage in a sexual act with…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- State v. LancasterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Hunt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- White v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Nightingale v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.